Unified MLOps for Defense: Bridging Cloud, On-Premises, and Tactical Edge AI

In an era of algorithmic warfare, artificial intelligence has become a cornerstone of modern defense strategy. According to the Department of Defense's AI Strategy document, AI represents "one of the most important technologies for national security" and is fundamentally reshaping the future of conflict. This isn't mere speculation – the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act allocated over $1.5 billion specifically for AI initiatives, signaling the critical nature of this technology. In fact, Global military spending is projected to jump **nearly 40 % to ≈ $3.3 trillion by 2030**, with an “increasing share … likely to go toward artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and other defence technologies.”

As defense contractors like Thales and Anduril race to deliver AI-powered capabilities from autonomous drones to battlefield sensor networks, they face a unique set of challenges stemming from the complex infrastructure landscape they must navigate. At ZenML, we've successfully partnered with organizations like the German Bundeswehr and a leading French aerospace defense manufacturer to address these exact challenges through a unified MLOps approach.

Defense-Specific MLOps Challenges

Defense AI development operates under constraints that simply don't exist in commercial environments:

Hybrid Infrastructure Complexity

Most defense contractors maintain a complex web of environments including AWS GovCloud, Azure Government, on-premises data centers, and completely air-gapped systems. This isn't a matter of preference – it's dictated by security requirements that mandate different classification levels (UNCLASSIFIED, SECRET, TOP SECRET/SCI) run on physically separate infrastructure.

According to RAND Corporation research, this segregation creates substantial friction in the AI development lifecycle, with model transfer between environments cited as a primary challenge. As one defense AI practitioner we worked with noted: "We essentially had three different ML teams using three different toolsets for what was essentially the same model – one for development, one for testing, and one for deployment."  RAND also found that “inadequate infrastructure to manage data and deploy models” is one of the top five reasons >80 % of AI projects fail.

Workflow and Resource Pain Points

This infrastructure complexity cascades into operational challenges:

• Inconsistent Development Experiences: Data scientists work in different environments with different tools depending on the classification level
• Reproducibility Nightmares: Models behave differently after transition between environments
• Resource Inefficiency: GPUs in secure facilities sit idle while teams queue for access in other environments.
• Audit Trail Fragmentation: Tracking model provenance across security boundaries becomes nearly impossible

When working with the German Armed Forces (Bundeswehr) on computer vision applications, we discovered their teams were spending significant development time simply maintaining compatibility between environments – time that could have been spent improving model performance instead.

Sovereignty Requirements

Defense AI applications demand complete control over data and models. The U.S. National Security Commission on AI has emphasized that maintaining data sovereignty is non-negotiable for defense applications, particularly when deployed with coalition partners. The EU’s AI strategy funnels **€20 billion / year of public-private money into “trustworthy AI” and stresses data-sovereignty safeguards** under the AI Act.

For the German Armed Forces, this meant their entire ML lifecycle – from training to deployment – needed to operate without any data leaving controlled environments, even for seemingly benign operations like package downloads or model registry access.

How ZenML Creates Unified MLOps for Defense

ZenML addresses these challenges through a comprehensive approach that spans environments while maintaining security:

Infrastructure Abstraction

The core of our solution is providing a consistent interface that works across AWS, Azure, on-premises, and air-gapped systems. This means data scientists write ML pipelines once and deploy them anywhere without changing code.

For the Bundeswehr, this translated to a significant reduction in environment-specific code. Their ML teams now maintain a single codebase for their computer vision applications while deploying to both development and classified environments with minimal friction.

Service Connectors

ZenML's service connectors provide a unified way to access computation resources, artifact storage, and orchestration services across different environments. Unlike traditional approaches that require environment-specific configurations, service connectors abstract away the complexities of authentication and access control.

Our French aerospace defense partner used this capability to provide standardized access to AWS compute resources, on-premises storage systems, and Kubernetes clusters across security boundaries – all while maintaining strict access controls defined by their security team.

# Example: Same pipeline code works across environments
@pipeline
def threat_detection_pipeline(data_path, model_config):
    # Processing occurs in the appropriate security domain
    training_data = ingest_data(data_path)
    preprocessed_data = preprocess(training_data)
    model = train_model(preprocessed_data, model_config)
    evaluate_model(model, preprocessed_data)
    # Deploy to appropriate target (cloud, on-prem, or edge)
    deploy_model(model)

Environment-Specific Stacks

ZenML's stack concept allows organizations to define environment-specific profiles that handle the unique requirements of each infrastructure without changing pipeline code. For example:

• Development Stack: Cloud-based resources for experimentation
• Classified Stack: Air-gapped environment with appropriate security controls
• Tactical Edge Stack: Optimized for deployment to field systems

Our French aerospace defense partner used this capability to maintain development velocity in their R&D environment while ensuring proper controls in production.

End-to-End Traceability

In defense applications, knowing exactly how a model was created is non-negotiable. ZenML provides consistent audit trails regardless of infrastructure, tracking every dataset, parameter, and artifact used in model creation.

This capability was critical for the Bundeswehr, as it allowed them to demonstrate compliance with their strict model governance requirements, including complete data lineage tracking that showed exactly what training data influenced each deployed model.

Unifying Defense ML Operations

Let's explore how these capabilities apply in a practical scenario similar to what defense contractors face today. Let’s take an example of a defense organization operating three distinct ML initiatives, each with different infrastructure requirements:

1. Battlefield Sensor Fusion: Models processing radar, infrared, and visual data for threat detection
2. Intelligence Analysis: LLMs for document processing and signal intelligence
3. Autonomous Systems: Computer vision for navigation and target recognition

Without a unified approach, each initiative develops its own workflows, creates its own tooling, and establishes separate infrastructure. This fragmentation leads to duplicated effort, inconsistent results, and security challenges when models need to move between environments.

ZenML allows this organization to establish a consistent workflow that spans their entire ML lifecycle while respecting security boundaries:

• Development teams can use familiar tools in their preferred environment
• Security requirements are enforced through pre-configured stacks
• Model artifacts are tracked consistently across environments
• Infrastructure utilization is optimized through proper resource sharing

This approach has proven effective across diverse defense applications. It can be applied for counter-UAS systems, developing models in simulation environments before confidently deploying to field systems with identical performance. For intelligence analysis, ZenML enables secure LLM fine-tuning while maintaining complete data sovereignty within appropriate security boundaries. Our French aerospace partner leverages this unified approach for autonomous platforms, maintaining pipeline consistency from simulation through hardware-in-loop testing to deployed systems, ensuring models behave consistently regardless of environment.

For organizations developing AI in multi-classification environments, this approach provides significant advantages in productivity, security, and governance – all critical factors in meeting the demanding requirements of modern defense applications.

Get Started with ZenML for Defense

If you're facing the challenge of managing ML operations across diverse infrastructure in defense contexts, ZenML offers a proven approach based on our work with the German Bundeswehr and a leading French aerospace defense company.

For organizations specifically interested in optimizing Kubernetes for ML workloads (a common infrastructure choice in defense), read our comprehensive guide on taming Kubernetes for enterprise ML.

Ready to transform your defense ML operations? Request a demo focused on your specific multi-infrastructure challenges.

‍