| Workflow Orchestration | ZenML is built to orchestrate multi-step ML pipelines across environments using swappable stack components, not just reproduce local command graphs. | DVC provides lightweight DAG execution via dvc.yaml + dvc repro, but it's primarily local and relies on external schedulers/CI for production orchestration. |
| Integration Flexibility | ZenML's stack architecture is designed to plug in best-of-breed tools (orchestrators, trackers, deployers, registries) without rewriting pipelines. | DVC integrates well with Git and storage backends, but doesn't offer a composable stack of interchangeable orchestration/deployment/monitoring components. |
| Vendor Lock-In | ZenML is cloud-agnostic by design: it can run on multiple clouds or on-prem by swapping stack components. | DVC core is Apache-2.0 OSS and can use many storage systems as remotes; DVC Studio is optional for teams that want a hosted UI. |
| Setup Complexity | ZenML can start locally quickly and scales by adding stack components incrementally as teams grow. | DVC is easy to bootstrap in an existing repo: install the CLI, dvc init, and optionally configure a remote; no server component is required. |
| Learning Curve | ZenML's learning curve pays off for teams building repeatable production pipelines with stacks, artifacts, and metadata concepts. | DVC's mental model maps closely to Git + build tools: version artifacts with pointers, define stages in dvc.yaml, and reproduce with dvc repro. |
| Scalability | ZenML scales by delegating execution to production orchestrators and managed services while keeping pipeline code portable across environments. | DVC scales well for large datasets via remotes and caching, but production workload orchestration typically requires pairing DVC with CI systems or other orchestrators. |
| Cost Model | ZenML's OSS core is free; managed offerings shift cost from infra/time to subscription for teams needing centralized governance and collaboration. | DVC core is free OSS (Apache-2.0); DVC Studio offers a free tier for individuals/small teams with paid options for larger teams. |
| Collaboration | ZenML emphasizes team collaboration through shared stacks, centralized metadata/lineage, and integration points for registries and dashboards. | DVC collaboration is Git-native (branches/PRs) and enhanced by DVC Studio, which adds experiment visualization, sharing, and team features. |
| ML Frameworks | ZenML integrates across many ML libraries and platforms while standardizing how artifacts/metadata flow through pipelines. | DVC is framework-agnostic (stages are commands), and DVCLive provides built-in integrations across many popular ML frameworks. |
| Monitoring | ZenML connects the training pipeline to production concerns including deployment and downstream monitoring integrations as part of an MLOps stack. | DVC focuses on tracking training-time experiments, metrics, and artifacts; it does not provide production inference monitoring out of the box. |
| Governance | ZenML's centralized metadata, lineage, and reproducibility primitives are designed to support governance requirements across environments and teams. | DVC provides strong auditability via Git history, but enterprise governance (RBAC, policy enforcement, audit workflows) depends on Git hosting and optional Studio features. |
| Experiment Tracking | ZenML can integrate with dedicated experiment trackers and also tracks pipeline runs and artifacts in a metadata store for end-to-end lineage. | Experiment tracking is a core DVC strength: experiments are stored as custom Git refs, runnable via dvc exp run, and enhanced with DVCLive + DVC Studio. |
| Reproducibility | ZenML provides reproducibility through tracked artifacts, caching, and lineage in a metadata store, even when execution moves across environments. | Reproducibility is foundational: DVC pipelines capture dependencies/outputs and reproduce results with dvc repro, with data/models versioned via cache + remotes. |
| Auto-Retraining | ZenML is designed for scheduled/triggered pipelines using orchestrators and CI/CD integrations, enabling automated retraining patterns. | DVC can participate in auto-retraining when paired with CI schedulers and CML, but does not provide a native always-on retraining orchestrator. |
from zenml import pipeline, step
@step
def load_data():
# Load and preprocess your data
...
return train_data, test_data
@step
def train_model(train_data):
# Train using ANY ML framework
...
return model
@step
def evaluate(model, test_data):
# Evaluate and log metrics
...
return metrics
@pipeline
def ml_pipeline():
train, test = load_data()
model = train_model(train)
evaluate(model, test)
import csv
import numpy as np
import dvc.api
from dvclive import Live
from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import joblib
# Stream a versioned dataset snapshot from DVC remote
with dvc.api.open("data/train.csv", rev="v1.1.0") as f:
rows = list(csv.DictReader(f))
X = np.array([[float(r["f1"]), float(r["f2"])] for r in rows])
y = np.array([int(r["label"]) for r in rows])
clf = SGDClassifier(loss="log_loss", random_state=42)
with Live() as live:
for _ in range(5):
clf.partial_fit(X, y, classes=np.unique(y))
live.log_metric("train/accuracy", float(accuracy_score(y, clf.predict(X))))
live.next_step()
joblib.dump(clf, "model.joblib")
.svg)
.png)
